Discussion:
Ashley Judd Is Sterile
(too old to reply)
rocker1
2007-03-30 00:39:07 UTC
Permalink
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago with
all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason Why Ashley went into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older( Dario
is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when they both
got tested.
Agent Smith
2007-03-30 04:16:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago with
all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason Why Ashley went into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older( Dario
is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when they both
got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having something to
do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets getting preggers,
that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if she'll ever reveal the
medical details.

OTOH, I always wanted a sterile g/f, because then you don't have to fool
with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about sudden
surprises, should ther be a failure.
m***@hotmail.com
2007-03-30 07:02:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agent Smith
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago with
all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason WhyAshleywent into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older( Dario
is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when they both
got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having something to
do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets getting preggers,
that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if she'll ever reveal the
medical details.
OTOH, I always wanted asterileg/f, because then you don't have to fool
with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about sudden
surprises, should ther be a failure.
Anorexia may cause problems with fertility but I dont think that is
the case with Ashley Judd. Anorexia is progressive and Ashley more
likely than not would have whitled away to nothing.
Ashley Judd problem had fertility issues all her life( At least that
is whats going on in the gossip channel) Remember that birth control
pills are not always trustworthy. It is more likely that after her
marriage to Dario She tried to concieve but could not ( besides she
could afford to have kids being a movie star)
Agent Smith
2007-03-30 12:30:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Post by Agent Smith
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago
with all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason WhyAshleywent into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older(
Dario is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when
they both got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having something
to do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets getting
preggers, that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if she'll ever
reveal the medical details.
OTOH, I always wanted asterileg/f, because then you don't have to
fool with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about
sudden surprises, should ther be a failure.
Anorexia is progressive
Do you have any references to this effect?
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Remember that birth control pills are not always trustworthy.
I've often thought that this is because women don't take them on the
strict schedule they're supposed to. They forget, skip pills and take
them late, just like people who take any other pills every day.
Post by m***@hotmail.com
It is more likely that after her
marriage to Dario She tried to concieve but could not ( besides she
could afford to have kids being a movie star)
She's a little eccentric. Besides flashing her bush at the Oscars, some
years back, she once called "Car Talk" with a family problem that
centered on cars. It turned out that Dario owned every single car in
the carage, which was several, and the solution was for her to get her
own, so she wouldn't be powerless in the garage. Her lack of ownership
was allowing her husband to push her around. What kind of oddball
doesn't own a car?

And people who call Car Talk are definitely eccentrics.
scooter34
2007-04-03 12:26:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agent Smith
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Post by Agent Smith
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago
with all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason WhyAshleywent into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older(
Dario is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when
they both got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having something
to do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets getting
preggers, that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if she'll ever
reveal the medical details.
OTOH, I always wanted asterileg/f, because then you don't have to
fool with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about
sudden surprises, should ther be a failure.
Anorexia is progressive
Do you have any references to this effect?
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Remember that birth control pills are not always trustworthy.
I've often thought that this is because women don't take them on the
strict schedule they're supposed to. They forget, skip pills and take
them late, just like people who take any other pills every day.
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.

scooter34
Agent Smith
2007-04-03 12:52:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by scooter34
Post by Agent Smith
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Post by Agent Smith
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago
with all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason WhyAshleywent into rehab. She's
been hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your
older( Dario is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it
out when they both got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having
something to do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets
getting preggers, that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if
she'll ever reveal the medical details.
OTOH, I always wanted asterileg/f, because then you don't have to
fool with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about
sudden surprises, should ther be a failure.
Anorexia is progressive
Do you have any references to this effect?
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Remember that birth control pills are not always trustworthy.
I've often thought that this is because women don't take them on the
strict schedule they're supposed to. They forget, skip pills and
take them late, just like people who take any other pills every day.
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow. I
used the latter once, and it worked fine.

After you flub the pill schedule, how many days does it take your levels
to rise back into the safe range, and are you now preggers, from your
faux pas? :o)
doomella
2007-04-03 13:03:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse yourself
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out, say
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the idea
that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption for hours after
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will. But I was
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what you're
asking.


I
Post by Agent Smith
used the latter once, and it worked fine.
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but it was meant for the girl.
Agent Smith
2007-04-03 13:54:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be
less effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer
20 years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality.
I nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram,
anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly-
and spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back
out, say "Now... where were we?"
Well, at least men don't care about that. They just wanna stick it in
there asap, and get to the main event.

You might ask your husband to poke his member up in the air and stroke
it, so you can have something exciting to look at, and not lose the
flow.
Post by doomella
whilst trying to eradicate from the
mind the idea that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic
contraption for hours after the act for maximum safety, albeit
allowing to fester what will.
I never thought of that. Are there side effects associated with having
the festering thing inside you?
Post by doomella
But I was never crazy about fucking
around with hormones either, so I get what you're asking.
Yeah, those hormones can be dangerous. In 50's, when The Pill was new,
doctors flubbed the dosages, and women were having strokes. Then they
tried to pull that "I'm the doctor and *I* know best" crap, to cover
their asses. That caused the shit to really hit the fan, and there were
congressional hearings.

I'm convinced the incident was critical to the early growth of Feminism.

I've also wondered whether people don't permit themselves to be sloppy
about the medication schedule, out of concern about side effects. When
you fumble the hormones, do the instructions say that you shouldn't
double up the second dose?
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
I used the latter once, and it worked fine.
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but it was meant for the girl.
I guess you're right, and apparently they're all meant for the girl.
Neither kind of condom works very well, either, nor do vasectomies.
Pretty much nothing works, and it's practically advertisement for the
withdrawal method.
Gregory Morrow
2007-04-04 01:13:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse yourself
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out, say
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the idea
that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption for hours after
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will. But I was
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what you're
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Post by doomella
I
Post by Agent Smith
used the latter once, and it worked fine.
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but it was meant for the girl.
Lol...
--
Best
Greg
doomella
2007-04-04 01:36:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality.
I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself
Post by doomella
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out,
say
Post by doomella
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the idea
that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption for hours
after
Post by doomella
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will. But I
was
Post by doomella
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what
you're
Post by doomella
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Thanks to all for the suggestions, but it really wasn't a cry for help; it
was a generic response to Dr. Smith's assertion that he "never understood
why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow." But thanks for the
effort! And as long as I'm on the podium, I'd like to extend further thanks
to the Agent, who suggested having the male party "poke his member up in the
air and stroke it, so that [I could] have something exciting to look at, and
not lose the flow." "Honey, keep strokin' that thing... It's almost
lodged.. Ow!!...." <sound of spring-loaded rubberized saucer hitting all
bathroom walls and decorating same with an opalescent de Kooningesque
spatter-pattern of Nonoxynol-9>
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
I
Post by Agent Smith
used the latter once, and it worked fine.
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but it was meant for the girl.
Lol...
--
Best
Greg
Gregory Morrow
2007-04-04 01:48:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality.
I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself
Post by doomella
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out,
say
Post by doomella
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the idea
that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption for hours
after
Post by doomella
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will. But I
was
Post by doomella
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what
you're
Post by doomella
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Thanks to all for the suggestions, but it really wasn't a cry for help; it
was a generic response to Dr. Smith's assertion that he "never understood
why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow." But thanks for the
effort! And as long as I'm on the podium, I'd like to extend further thanks
to the Agent, who suggested having the male party "poke his member up in the
air and stroke it, so that [I could] have something exciting to look at, and
not lose the flow." "Honey, keep strokin' that thing... It's almost
lodged.. Ow!!...." <sound of spring-loaded rubberized saucer hitting all
bathroom walls and decorating same with an opalescent de Kooningesque
spatter-pattern of Nonoxynol-9>
They should have diaphragms in all different groovy colors, make them a
"fashion statement" a la the iPod...you could even have a "Hello Kitty" -
themed one. The possibilities are so endless they oogie me out...!!!
--
Best
Greg
Agent Smith
2007-04-04 01:49:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab
tests show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them
to be less effective. As someone who forgot to take hers
yesterday (afer 20 years!) I can attest to how easy it is to
forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an
eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself
Post by doomella
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out,
say
Post by doomella
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the
idea that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption
for hours
after
Post by doomella
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will.
But I
was
Post by doomella
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what
you're
Post by doomella
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Thanks to all for the suggestions, but it really wasn't a cry for
help; it was a generic response to Dr. Smith's assertion that he
"never understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram,
anyhow." But thanks for the effort! And as long as I'm on the podium,
I'd like to extend further thanks to the Agent, who suggested having
the male party "poke his member up in the air and stroke it, so that
[I could] have something exciting to look at, and not lose the flow."
"Honey, keep strokin' that thing... It's almost lodged.. Ow!!...."
<sound of spring-loaded rubberized saucer hitting all bathroom walls
and decorating same with an opalescent de Kooningesque spatter-pattern
of Nonoxynol-9>
I was just trying to be helpful, but given the image you just created,
I'd also suggest doing it under a black light. There will be showers of
little glowing "sparks" everywhere.
doomella
2007-04-04 02:28:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agent Smith
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab
tests show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them
to be less effective. As someone who forgot to take hers
yesterday (afer 20 years!) I can attest to how easy it is to
forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an
eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself
Post by doomella
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out,
say
Post by doomella
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the
idea that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption
for hours
after
Post by doomella
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will.
But I
was
Post by doomella
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what
you're
Post by doomella
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Thanks to all for the suggestions, but it really wasn't a cry for
help; it was a generic response to Dr. Smith's assertion that he
"never understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram,
anyhow." But thanks for the effort! And as long as I'm on the podium,
I'd like to extend further thanks to the Agent, who suggested having
the male party "poke his member up in the air and stroke it, so that
[I could] have something exciting to look at, and not lose the flow."
"Honey, keep strokin' that thing... It's almost lodged.. Ow!!...."
<sound of spring-loaded rubberized saucer hitting all bathroom walls
and decorating same with an opalescent de Kooningesque spatter-pattern
of Nonoxynol-9>
I was just trying to be helpful, but given the image you just created,
I'd also suggest doing it under a black light. There will be showers of
little glowing "sparks" everywhere.
Luminol!!!!!
Now you're talking!
Agent Smith
2007-04-04 02:33:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agent Smith
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab
tests show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes
them to be less effective. As someone who forgot to take hers
yesterday (afer 20 years!) I can attest to how easy it is to
forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an
eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself
Post by doomella
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out,
say
Post by doomella
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind
the idea that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic
contraption for hours
after
Post by doomella
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will.
But I
was
Post by doomella
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what
you're
Post by doomella
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Thanks to all for the suggestions, but it really wasn't a cry for
help; it was a generic response to Dr. Smith's assertion that he
"never understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram,
anyhow." But thanks for the effort! And as long as I'm on the
podium, I'd like to extend further thanks to the Agent, who
suggested having the male party "poke his member up in the air and
stroke it, so that [I could] have something exciting to look at, and
not lose the flow." "Honey, keep strokin' that thing... It's almost
lodged.. Ow!!...." <sound of spring-loaded rubberized saucer hitting
all bathroom walls and decorating same with an opalescent de
Kooningesque spatter-pattern of Nonoxynol-9>
I was just trying to be helpful, but given the image you just
created, I'd also suggest doing it under a black light. There will
be showers of little glowing "sparks" everywhere.
Luminol!!!!! Now you're talking!
Hey baby, I dropped acid in the 60's too, and then I bought a collection
of psychedelic, black-light, comic book posters from the era.
Cosmiiiiiic, man.

r***@gmail.com
2007-04-04 01:41:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by doomella
Post by doomella
Post by Agent Smith
Post by scooter34
My doctor told me that very same thing 20 years ago - that lab tests
show them to be 100% effective, but human error causes them to be less
effective. As someone who forgot to take hers yesterday (afer 20
years!) I can attest to how easy it is to forget.
You should keep a diaphragm in reserve, for just such an eventuality. I
nevr understood why some people prefer the pill to the 'fram, anyhow.
It could have something to do with the fact that you have to excuse
yourself
Post by doomella
from the romantic antics to go insert a contraceptive-jelly- and
spring-loaded saucer into yourself, then try to casually walk back out,
say
Post by doomella
"Now... where were we?" whilst trying to eradicate from the mind the idea
that you'll have to be sportin' that trampolinic contraption for hours
after
Post by doomella
the act for maximum safety, albeit allowing to fester what will. But I
was
Post by doomella
never crazy about fucking around with hormones either, so I get what
you're
Post by doomella
asking.
Have the man insert it, make it part of erotic foreplay...like a gal putting
a raincoat on a guy.
Post by doomella
I
Post by Agent Smith
used the latter once, and it worked fine.
I hate to be the one to tell you this, but it was meant for the girl.
Lol...
--
Best
Greg- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
OOOH DAMM( Flamebait)
STERILE STERILE STERILE STERILE STERILE
Dario can use all the erotic foreplay for trying to get Ashley
Pregnant but it is Impossible because Ashley's Plumbing is All Fucked
UP and Jacked.
Contraceptive dont do SHIT. Not when you are naturally more barren
than Death Valley.
Dario kept hammering away but he should have realized that others who
have preceeded him with Ashley all came away empty handed :)
None of those guys werent firing blanks and Ashley still did not get
pregnant
Facet It Ashley you need to Adopt cause you are WAY TOO STERILE for
your own kid
Claire
2007-03-30 16:47:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agent Smith
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago with
all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason Why Ashley went into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older( Dario
is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when they both
got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having something to
do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets getting preggers,
that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if she'll ever reveal the
medical details.
OTOH, I always wanted a sterile g/f, because then you don't have to fool
with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about sudden
surprises, should ther be a failure.
If you're so concerned why don't you have a vasectomy?
That way you can be sterile, you insensitive creep.
rocker1
2007-03-30 17:15:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Claire
"> > >>>
If you're so concerned why don't you have a vasectomy?
That way you can besterile, you insensitive creep.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Touchy are we
I dont think the last quoter was insensitvie but merely stating some
news and making and observation. If Ashley Judd is Sterile ti could
be traumatic to have bad news like that. Even though infertility can
be treated in some cases in most cases it cannot. That may be the case
with Ashley Judd
Agent Smith
2007-03-30 18:15:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by rocker1
Post by Claire
"> > >>>
If you're so concerned why don't you have a vasectomy?
That way you can besterile, you insensitive creep.>
Touchy are we
I dont think the last quoter was insensitvie but merely stating some
news and making and observation. If Ashley Judd is Sterile ti could
be traumatic to have bad news like that. Even though infertility can
be treated in some cases in most cases it cannot. That may be the case
with Ashley Judd
This is a job for <Deep Booming Voice of God> STEM CELLS!
m***@hotmail.com
2007-03-30 20:30:32 UTC
Permalink
"> > >>>
This is a job for <Deep Booming Voice of God> STEM CELLS!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
STEM CELLS. Now thats a bowl of controversy. Though I doubt it would
help women who are sterile and it must cost a load of cash. Ashley has
a lot being a millionaire actress and probably got the best treatments
possible but in the end to no avail as she has not concieved. If
Ashley Judd is completely Sterile she will be unable concieve and will
likely adopt
No problems there
Agent Smith
2007-03-30 20:53:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@hotmail.com
"> > >>>
This is a job for <Deep Booming Voice of God> STEM CELLS!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
STEM CELLS. Now thats a bowl of controversy.
That's the Understatement of the Day. Stem cells are more like the
Super-Bowl of controversy. :o)
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Though I doubt it would help women who are sterile
Afaik, the promise of stem cells is so broad that it involves regrowing
virtually any cells or tissues that are malfunctioning. That's why
doctors hold out so much hope for them. As to *when* we might see the
promise realized, well, if the Bush's ban were lifted tomorrow, it might
still take 20-50 years to realize the potential of any specific
treatment. I wonder if there may be more potential than there are
doctors to research it.

I'm sure that there would be hard technical details associated with
regrowing the eggs themselves, but any cells produced by any phase of
development can theoretically be grown with a stem cell, and that
includes eggs, too. That's kind of a novel recursion, isn't it - using
an egg to grow an egg.

The worst that I could see happening would be that Judd's eggs would be
her faulty cells, so she could never use one of her own eggs to regrow
the necessary reproductive tissue. But the worst would then be that
she'd have to grow some other woman's eggs, which would be like using an
egg donor. I can see a new controversy arising, if the fetus donor
didn't agree to allow other people to use it to grow eggs from the
fetus. That's a little like being an unwilling egg donor, but I leave
that to the ethicists to work out.
Post by m***@hotmail.com
and it must cost a load of cash.
That goes without saying, but of 'course, Ash *has* a load of cash. She
could buy a ride into space, if she wanted to, and maybe she already
has. :)
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Ashley has
a lot being a millionaire actress and probably got the best treatments
possible but in the end to no avail as she has not concieved.
I'm sure you're right, which is why I suggested stem cells. That's the
field that seems to hold the most promise for incurable diseases. Come
to think of it, since we'll have a Democratic president in '09, the Bush
Ban will probably soon be lifted.
Post by m***@hotmail.com
If Ashley Judd is completely Sterile she will be unable concieve and
will likely adopt
That's the only thing she can do, if the treatment she needs isn't even
in the laboratory yet.
Agent Smith
2007-03-30 18:12:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Claire
Post by Agent Smith
Post by rocker1
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago
with all the men she has screwed.
Not necessarily
I think thats the main reason Why Ashley went into rehab. She's been
hooked to dairo for a long time and its harder when your older(
Dario is younger) to have kids. I guess she figured it out when
they both got tested.
I was gonna say something snide about her enorexia having something
to do with it, but, with all the other anorexic starlets getting
preggers, that's obviously not the reason. I wonder if she'll ever
reveal the medical details.
OTOH, I always wanted a sterile g/f, because then you don't have to
fool with birth control at inconvenient moments, or worrying about
sudden surprises, should ther be a failure.
If you're so concerned why don't you have a vasectomy?
That way you can be sterile, you insensitive creep.
I've thought of it, for just the reason you say, but unfortunately you
can't change your mind about a vasectomy. Although I'll soon be 47, I'm
still immature enough to want to sow wild oats. But I haven't given up
hope that someday I may have kids of my own.

I'm sorry if I sound insensitive, but what I was really trying to say is
that many dark clouds have silver linings, and this may be one of them.
This is one of those situations where the (supposed) downside can be
seen, by some people, as a positive. It can be seen as an opportunity
to do things that most of us only fantasize about, and that life's
realities generally prohibit us from ever doing.

This group is full of women who dislike breeders, although you are
apparently not one of them.
wolf359
2007-03-30 15:48:12 UTC
Permalink
On 30 Mar 2007 01:21:29 GMT, "It's the Principle!"
On 29 Mar 2007 17:16:58 -0700, "rocker1"
On the newsAshleyJuddand ?her race car hubby Dario may be
looking to adpot a child after trying to concieve naturally on
thier own . SinceAshleyJudddiscovered she was infertile ?and
unable to have children naturally, she has been looking to ?adopt
a la Angelina Jolie whom she has praised for her UN work. Both
Ashleyand Dario have looked to adoption sinceAshleyhas
discovered ?that she is profoundlysterile
You would think she would have figured that out a long time ago
with all the men she has screwed.
That's not true. ?Regardless of whether she's screwed 1 or 101, if she
was a responsible adult using birth control, there's no way she'd know
whether she wassterileuntil it was all stopped and she tried to
conceive. ?
Didn't make it all the way through biology, I see.
--
Brandy Alexandre
Yeah, if that was true, Brandy would have had about 500 kids by now.
;-)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Double Ouch!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Ashley Judd is probably compensating for her sterility by pushing
contraception ( See article below)
http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-7867.html

It must be traumatic for her that she is unable to have children of
her own and probably she went to rehab for that reason.Thats probably
why she is pushing contraception as a way of lashing out
r***@gmail.com
2007-03-31 00:13:20 UTC
Permalink
Good news! One less to spawn!
OH DAMN!!!!!
I did not know that about Ashley Judd. She is sooo HOT HOT HOT. But
she is Sterile and cant have any kids. That SUCKS
been nice to see what kid of kids she could ve had
Too bad her plumbing is fucked up
marybones@verizon.net
2007-03-31 01:10:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by r***@gmail.com
Good news! One less to spawn!
OH DAMN!!!!!
I did not know that about Ashley Judd. She is sooo HOT HOT HOT. But
she is Sterile and cant have any kids. That SUCKS
been nice to see what kid of kids she could ve had
Too bad her plumbing is fucked up
Too bad! BUT I know an "infertile" woman who went in for testing,
and the test blew the blockage out of her fallopian tubes, baby to
follow immediately. Who is now a TOTALLY annoying ten-y-o, be careful
what you wish for, right?
m***@hotmail.com
2007-04-01 05:33:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@verizon.net
Too bad! BUT I know an "infertile" woman who went in for testing,
and the test blew the blockage out of her fallopian tubes, baby to
follow immediately. Who is now a TOTALLY annoying ten-y-o, be careful
what you wish for, right?
I doubt that will be Ashley,s problem anytime soon. News vine have it
that Ashley's ovaries are deader that an door knob. Stem cell or no
stem cell She wont be having any annoying ten y-o any time soon.
marybones@verizon.net
2007-04-01 10:08:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@hotmail.com
I doubt that will be Ashley,s problem anytime soon. News vine have it
that Ashley's ovaries are deader that an door knob. Stem cell or no
stem cell She wont be having any annoying ten y-o any time soon.
Well, let's light a candle for her to get what she wants - maybe it
will happen for her. She seems to be happily married and wants a baby
- it could happen. I know women who have adopted and immediately
thereafter get pregnant, too interesting. So it's not Irish twins, we
need a new term for this. Anyway, she seems so nice.
Ilene Bilenky
2007-04-01 22:11:16 UTC
Permalink
I think unless one's parts are actually missing, "sterile" is too strong
a word. "Subfertile" might make more sense. I know too many people who
had a surprise pregnancy years after fertility treatments, and even
after tubal ligation. (If tubals are done at the time of birth, they
have a higher chance of growing together, since the body is in healing
mod after the trauma of birth. The pregnancy I'm thinking of was ten
years after the woman gave birth and got a tubal).

Another friend, supposedly sterile, had successful IVF and had a healthy
baby. Three years later, she had a 'whoops' with no treatments at all.

I believe some fert treatments are linked to ovarian cancer. After all,
you're trying to turbocharge cell growth. See Under: Gilda Radner.

These things aren't without huge risks. I hope Judd and other people who
aren't able to have bio kids in a healthy way go and adopt as many kids
as they want, and everyone wins. I love adoption.

Ilene B
rocker1
2007-04-03 00:32:04 UTC
Permalink
Subfertile.
Impossible. That is like being half pregnant. It doesnt work. Either
you are fertile or not
Ashley Judd simply cannot have biological Children. It could be that
her ovaries are dead( Premature Ovarian Failure) and that condition
could have exsisted for her since childhood. But the buzz on the wire
is that she and Dario tried for several years and Ashley was unable to
concieve. Tests later revealed that she was completely infertile.
Treaments were to no avail. Thats probably why she may adopt as her
only recourse
r***@gmail.com
2007-04-03 00:40:36 UTC
Permalink
STERILE! STERILE STERILE!!!!!!!!!!!
Shit Dario was pounding away with all salvos only to find that Ashley
Judd's plumbing doesnt work
Damn. Ashley Judd is wicked sexy HOT!!!!!!!! Too bad her Ovaries are
dead as door knob
Maybe Ashley Judd could do a "RASING ARIZONA" :) and grab some kids
marybones@verizon.net
2007-04-03 01:34:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by r***@gmail.com
Maybe Ashley Judd could do a "RASING ARIZONA" :) and grab some kids
Now now, be nice.

Maybe she could pull an Angelina and... you fill in the punch line,
it's toooo obvious.
I***@gmail.com
2007-04-03 03:36:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@verizon.net
Post by r***@gmail.com
Maybe Ashley Judd could do a "RASING ARIZONA" :) and grab some kids
Now now, be nice.
Maybe she could pull an Angelina and... you fill in the punch line,
it's toooo obvious.
______________________________________________________________________
The girl got Chlamydia and can't have kids. That happens when you
screw thousands of men.
Magda
2007-04-03 08:09:22 UTC
Permalink
On 2 Apr 2007 20:36:01 -0700, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "***@gmail.com"
<***@gmail.com> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... On Apr 2, 6:34 pm, "***@verizon.net" <***@rcn.com> wrote:
... > On Apr 2, 8:40 pm, ***@gmail.com wrote:
... >
... > > Maybe Ashley Judd could do a "RASING ARIZONA" :) and grab some kids
... >
... > Now now, be nice.
... >
... > Maybe she could pull an Angelina and... you fill in the punch line,
... > it's toooo obvious.
...
... ______________________________________________________________________
... The girl got Chlamydia and can't have kids. That happens when you
... screw thousands of men.

Jealous?
marybones@verizon.net
2007-04-03 10:31:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Magda
... ______________________________________________________________________
... The girl got Chlamydia and can't have kids. That happens when you
... screw thousands of men.
Jealous?
I know! Honestly. I know SO many women with fertility problems- it's
not like it's a choice, it's something to deal with.
Weatherman
2007-04-03 12:38:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by rocker1
Impossible. That is like being half pregnant. It doesnt work. Either
you are fertile or not
Ashley Judd simply cannot have biological Children. It could be that
her ovaries are dead( Premature Ovarian Failure) and that condition
could have exsisted for her since childhood. But the buzz on the wire
is that she and Dario tried for several years and Ashley was unable to
concieve. Tests later revealed that she was completely infertile.
Treaments were to no avail. Thats probably why she may adopt as her
only recourse
Women start menstruating at around age 12-14 and are biologically
geared to have kids ages 17-27. After that fertility plummets
rapidly. Our current ear is like the Victorian age in that we have
gotten far away from our biological roots. No one should be surprised
women nearing 40 are not able to conceive. And if you throw in years
of bad nutrition (women's bodies were not meant to be as lean as most
Hollywood stars') you have a disaster. This surprises people??/ The
surprise should be that women age 40 get pregnant at all. And by the
way, if they do there is a 1 in 25 chance of Downs Syndrome.
Ilene Bilenky
2007-04-03 15:52:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by rocker1
Subfertile.
Impossible. That is like being half pregnant. It doesnt work. Either
you are fertile or not
What I mean by "subfertile," is that I believe the medical definition of
infertile is no conception after one year of unprotected regular sex
(and maybe six months after age 40 or so).

I had a friend who was "infertile," no conception except one ectopic (1)
after years of marriage and regular unprotected sex. She had a healthy
single baby from IVF and continued (late 30s) to have unprotected
marital sex. Five years later, she had a surprise pregnancy and healthy
baby.

I appreciate that people who really want to conceive/birth kids might
not want to go on for years in the hope of a surprise pregnancy, but if
the parts are there, they are subfertile, not "sterile."

Ilene B
Loading...